Africa
Britain in 1885 and France in 1892 and 1907 the Liberian republic was
Confined to an area of about 43,000 sq. m.
The real struggle in West Africa was between France and Great Britain,
and France played the dominant part, the exhaustion of Portugal, the apathy
of the British government and the late appearance of Germany in the field
being all elements that favoured the success of French policy. Before
tracing the steps in the historic contest between France and Great Britain
it is necessary, however, to deal briefly with the part played by Germany.
She naturally could not be disposed of by the chief rivals as easily as
were Portugal and Liberia. It will be remembered that Dr Nachtigal, while
the proposals for the Berlin conference were under discussion, had planted
the German flag on the coast of Togo and in Cameroon in the month of July
1884. In Cameroon Germany found herself with Great Britain for a neighbour
to the north, and with France as her southern neighbour on the Gabun river.
The utmost activity was displayed in making treaties with native chiefs,
and in securing as wide a range of coast for German enterprise as was
possible. After various provisional agreements had been concluded between
Great Britain and Germany, a ``provisional line of demarcation'' was
adopted in the famous agreement of the 1st of July 1890, starting from the
head of the Rio del Rey creek and going to the point, about 9 deg. 8' E.,
marked ``rapids'' on the British Admiralty chart. By a further agreement of
the 14th of April 1893, the right bank of the Rio del Rey was made the
boundary between the Oil Rivers Protectorate (now Southern Nigeria) and
Cameroon. In the following November (1893) the boundary was continued from
the ``rapids'' before mentioned, on the Calabar or Cross river, in a
straight line towards the centre of the town of Yola, on the Benue river.
Yola itself, with a radius
Germany in West Central Africa.
of some 3 m., was left in the British sphere, and the German boundary
followed the circle eastwards from the point of intersection as it neared
Yola until it met the Benue river. From that point it crossed the river to
the intersection of the 13th degree of longitude with the 10th degree of
north latitude, and then made direct for a point on the southern shore of
Lake Chad ``situated 35 minutes east of the meridian of Kuka.'' By this
agreement the British government withdrew from a considerable section of
the upper waters of the Benue with which the Royal Niger Company had
entered into relations. The limit of Germany's possible extension eastwards
was fixed at the basin of the river Shari, and Darfur, Kordofan and the
Bahr-el-Ghazal were to be excluded from her sphere of influence. The object
of Great Britain in making the sacrifice she did was two-fold. By
satisfying Germany's desire for a part of Lake Chad a check was put on
French designs on the Benue region, while by recognizing the central Sudan
(Wadai, &c.) in the German sphere, a barrier was interposed to the advance
of France from the Congo to the Nile. This last object was not attained,
inasmuch as Germany in coming to terms with France as to the southern and
eastern limits of Cameroon abandoned her claims to the central Sudan. She
had already, on the 24th of December 1885, signed a protocol with France
fixing her southern frontier, where it was coterminous with the French
Congo colony. But to the east German explorers were crossing the track of
French explorers from the northern bank of the Ubangi, and the need for an
agreement was obvious. Accordingly, on the 4th of February 1894, a
protocol—which, some weeks later, was confirmed by a convention— was signed
at Berlin, by which France accepted the presence of Germany on Lake Chad as
a fait accompli and effected the best bargain she could by making the left
bank of the Shari river, from its outlet into Lake Chad to the 10th
parallel of north latitude, the eastern limit of German extension. From
this point the boundary line went due west some 230 m., then turned south,
and with various indentations joined the south-eastern frontier, which had
been slightly extended so as to give Germany access to the Sanga river— a
tributary of the Congo. Thus, early in 1894, the German Cameroon colony had
reached fairly definite limits. In 1908 another convention, modifying the
frontier, gave Germany a larger share of the Sanga, while France, among
other advantages, gained the left bank of the Shari to 10 deg. 40' N.
The German Togoland settlements occupy a narrow strip of the Guinea
coast, some 35 m. only in length, wedged in between the British Gold Coast
and French Dahomey. At first France was inclined to dispute Germany's
claims to Little Popo and Porto Seguro; but in December 1885 the French
government acknowledged the German protectorate over these
Exclusion of Germany from the Niger.
places, and the boundary between French and German territory, which runs
north from the coast to the 11th decree of latitude, was laid down by the
Franco-German convention of the 12th of July 1897. The fixing of the 11th
parallel as the northern boundary of German expansion towards the interior
was not accomplished without some sacrifice of German ambitions. Having
secured an opening on Lake Chad for her Cameroon colony, Germany was
anxious to obtain a footing on the middle Niger for Togoland. German
expeditions reached Gando, one of the tributary states of the Sokoto empire
on the middle Niger, and, notwithstanding the existence of prior treaties
with Great Britain, sought to conclude agreements with the sultan of that
country. But this German ambition conflicted both with the British and the
French designs in West Africa, and eventually Germany had to be content
with the 11th parallel as her northern frontier. On the west the Togoland
frontier on the coast was fixed in July 1886 by British and German
commissioners at 1 deg. 10' E. longitude, and its extension towards the
interior laid down for a short distance. A curious feature in the history
of its prolongation was the establishment in 1888 of a neutral zone wherein
neither power was to seek to acquire protectorates nor exclusive influence.
It was not until November 1899 that, as part of the Samoa settlement, this
neutral zone was partitioned between the two powers and the frontier
extended to the 11th parallel.
The story of the struggle between France and Great Britain in West Africa
may roughly be divided into two sections, the
Anglo-French rivalry in West Africa.
first dealing with the Coast colonies, the second dealing with the struggle
for the middle Niger and Lake Chad. As regards the Coast colonies, France
was wholly successful in her design of isolating all Great Britain's
separate possessions in that region, and of securing for herself undisputed
possession of the upper Niger and of the countries lying within the great
bend of that river. When the British government awoke to the consciousness
of what was at stake France had obtained too great a start. French
governors of the Senegal had succeeded, before the Berlin Conference, in
establishing forts on the upper Niger, and the advantage thus gained was
steadily pursued. Every winter season French posts were pushed farther and
farther along the river, or in the vast regions watered by the southern
tributaries of the Senegal and Niger rivers. This ceaseless activity met
with its reward. Great Britain found herself compelled to acknowledge
accomplished facts and to conclude agreements with France, which left her
colonies mere coast patches, with a very limited extension towards the
interior. On the 10th of August 1889 an agreement was signed by which the
Gambia colony and protectorate was confined to a narrow strip of territory
on both banks of the river for about 200 m. from the sea. In June 1882 and
in August 1889 provisional agreements were made with France fixing the
western and northern limits of Sierra Leone, and commissioners were
appointed to trace the line of demarcation agreed upon by the two
governments. But the commissioners failed to agree, and on the 21st of
January 1895 a fresh agreement was made, the boundary being subsequently
traced by a mixed commission. Sierra Leone, as now definitely constituted,
has a coast-line of about 180 m. and a maximum extension towards the
interior of some 200 m.
At the date of the Berlin conference the present colonies of Southern
Nigeria and the Gold Coast constituted a single colony under the title of
the Gold Coast colony, but on the 13th of January 1886 the territory
comprised under that title was erected into two separate colonies—Lagos and
the Gold Coast (the name of the former being changed in February 1906 to
the colony of Southern Nigeria). The coast limits of the new Gold Coast
colony were declared to extend from 5 deg. W. to 2 deg. E., but these
limits were subsequently curtailed by agreements with France and Germany.
The arrangements that fixed the eastern frontier of the Gold Coast colony
and its hinterland have already been stated in connexion with German
Togoland. On the western frontier it marches with the French colony of the
Ivory Coast, and in July 1893, after an unsuccessful attempt to achieve the
same end by an agreement concluded in 1889, the frontier was defined from
the neighbourhood of the Tano lagoon and river of the same name, to the 9th
degree of north latitude. In August 1896, following the destruction of the
Ashanti power and the deportation of King Prempeh, as a result of the
second Ashanti campaign, a British protectorate was declared over the whole
of the Ashanti territories and a resident was installed at Kumasi. But no
northern limit had been fixed by the 1893 agreement beyond the 9th
parallel, and the countries to the north—Gurunsi (Grusi), Mossi and Gurma—-
were entered from all sides by rival British, French and German
expeditions. The conflicting claims established by these rival expeditions
may, however, best be considered in connexion with the struggle for
supremacy on the middle Niger and in the Chad region, to which it is now
necessary to turn.
A few days before the meeting of the Berlin conference Sir George Goldie
had succeeded in buying up all the French interests on the lower Niger. The
British company's influence had at that date been extended by treaties with
the native chiefs up the main Niger stream to its junction with the Benue,
and some distance along this latter river But the great Fula states of the
central Sudan were still outside European influence, and this fact did not
escape attention in Germany. German merchants had been settled for some
years on the coast, and one of them, E. R. Flegel, had displayed great
interest in, and activity on, the river. He recognized that in the densely
populated states of the middle Niger, Sokoto and Gando, and in Bornu to the
west of Lake Chad, there was a magnificent field for Germany's new-born
colonizing zeal. The German African Company14 and the German Colonial
Society listened eagerly to Flegel's proposals, and in April 1885 he left
Berlin on a mission to the Fula states of Sokoto and Gando. But it was
impossible to keep his intentions entirely secret, and the (British)
National African Company had no desire to see the French rivals, whom they
had with so much difficulty dislodged from the river, replaced by the even
more troublesome German. Accordingly Joseph Thomson, the young Scottish
explorer, was sent out to the Niger, and had the satisfaction of concluding
on the 1st of June 1885 a treaty with ``Umoru, King of the Mussulmans of
the Sudan and Sultan of Sokoto,'' which practically secured the whole of
the trading rights and the control of the sultan's foreign relations to the
British company. Thomson concluded a similar treaty with the sultan of
Gando, so as to provide against the possibility of its being alleged that
Gando was an independent state and not subject to the suzerainty of the
sultan of Sokoto. As Thomson descended the river with his treaties, he met
Flegel going up the river, with bundles of German flags and presents for
the chiefs. The German government continued its efforts to secure a footing
on the lower Niger until the fall of Prince Bismarck from power in March
1890, when opposition ceased, and on the failure of the half-hearted
attempt made later to establish relations with Gando from Togoland, Germany
dropped out of the competition for the
The Niger Company granted a charter.
western Sudan and left the field to France and Great Britain. After its
first great success the National African Company renewed its efforts to
obtain a charter from the British government, and on the 10th of July 1886
the charter was granted, and the company became ``The Royal Niger Company,
chartered and limited.'' In June of the previous year a British
protectorate had been proclaimed Over the whole of the coast from the Rio
del Rey to the Lagos frontier, and as already stated, on the 13th of
January 1886 the Lagos settlements had been separated from the Gold Coast
and erected into a separate colony. It may be convenient to state here that
the western boundary of Lagos with French territory (Dahomey) was
determined in the Anglo-French agreement of the 10th of August 1889, ``as
far as the 9th degree of north latitude, where it shall stop.'' Thus both
in the Gold Coast hinterland and in the Lagos hinterland a door was left
wide open to the north of the 9th parallel.
Notwithstanding her strenuous efforts, France, in her advance down the
Niger from Senegal, did not succeed in reaching Sego on the upper Niger, a
considerable distance above Timbuktu, until the winter of 1890-1891, and
the rapid advance of British influence up the river raised serious fears
lest the Royal Niger Company should reach Timbuktu before France could
forestall her. It was, no doubt, this consideration that induced the French
government to consent to the insertion in the agreement of the 5th of
August 1890, by which Great Britain recognized France's protectorate over
Madagascar, of the following article:
The Government of Her Britannic Majesty recognizes the sphere of
influence of France to the south of her Mediterranean possessions up to a
line from Say on the Niger to Barrua on Lake Chad, drawn m such a manner as
to comprise in the sphere of action of the Niger Company all that fairly
belongs to the kingdom of Sokoto; the line to be determined by the
commissioners to be appointed.
The commissioners never were in fact appointed, and the proper meaning to
be attached to this article subsequently became a subject of bitter
controversy between the two countries. An examination of the map of West
Africa will show what possibilities of trouble were left open at the end of
1890 by the various agreements concluded up to that date. From Say on the
Niger to where the Lagos frontier came to an abrupt stop in 9 deg. N. there
was no boundary line between the French and British spheres of influence.
To the north of the Gold Coast and of the French Ivory Coast colony the way
was equally open to Great Britain and to France, while the vagueness of the
Say-Barrua line left an opening of which France was quick to avail herself.
Captain P. L. Monteil, who was despatched by the French government to West
Africa in 1890, immediately after the conclusion of the August agreement,
did not hesitate to pass well to the south of the Say-Barrua line, and to
attempt to conclude treaties with chiefs who were, beyond all question,
within the British sphere. Still farther south, on the Benue river, the two
expeditions of Lieutenant Mizon—in 1890 and 1892—failed to do any real harm
to British interests. In 1892 an event happened which had an important
bearing on the future course of the dispute.
French advance Timbuktu.
After a troublesome war with Behanzin king of to the native state of
Dahomey, France annexed some portion of Dahomeyan territory on the coast,
and declared a protectorate over the rest of the kingdom. Thus was removed
the barrier which had up to that time prevented France from pushing her way
Nigerwards from her possessions on the Slave Coast, as well as from the
upper Niger and the Ivory Coast. Henceforth her progress from all these
directions was rapid, and in particular Timbuktu was occupied in the last
days of 1893.
In 1894 it appears to have been suddenly realized in France that, for the
development of the vast regions which she was placing under her protection
in West Africa, it was extremely desirable that she should obtain free
access to the navigable portions of the Niger, if not on the left bank,
from which she was excluded by the Say-Barrua agreement, then on the right
bank, where the frontier had still to be fixed by international agreement.
In the neighbourhood of Bussa there is a long stretch of the river so
impeded by rapids that navigation is practically impossible, except in
small boats and at considerable risk. Below these rapids France had no
foothold on the river, both banks from Bussa to the sea being within the
British sphere. In 1890 the Royal Niger Company had concluded a treaty with
Страницы: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
|